DIREITO E PODER EM KELSEN

Authors

  • Inês Pinheiro Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa
  • Giovanni Damele Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Keywords:

Law, Power, Hans Kelsen, Juridical Positivism, State of law

Abstract

In this article we seek to combine the two main aspects of Hans Kelsen’s work, the juridical and the political, with the goal of reconstructing the role played by the concept of power in his thought. These dimensions have been studied individually by the vast majority of literature, with the exception of some seminal works like Bobbio’s (2013), Dyzenhaus’s (1997) and Vinx’s (2007). However, we consider that this separation prevents us from identifying one of Kelsen’s main concerns: the safety of the citizens. Thus, in our interpretation, there is a relation between the kelsenian jurisprudential theory, depurated from empirical social reality and from any moral obligations, and his political conception of the democratic rule of law, mainly in what concerns the application of his Pure Theory of Law in the defence of liberal democracy. We thus consider that this dynamic embodies a well-defined conception of power that justifies, primarily, Kelsen’s depersonalization of law and the introduction of the basic norm in his Pure Theory; and, consequently, his defence of a democratic regime. We argue, as well, that Kelsen’s positioning, both juridically and politically, strives for eliminating any room for the arbitrary use of power. In this sense, we conclude that his posture comes, not from concretizing certain ethical-political contents, but from the option in favour of guaranteeing the juridical, political, and individual safety of the citizens, through juridical and political automatisms, that allow the latter to act while predicting the consequences of their juridical actions.

Author Biographies

Inês Pinheiro, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Mestranda em Filosofia, na área de especialização em Filosofia Política, na Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.

Giovanni Damele, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Ph.D. Università di Torino, Turim, 2006. Investigador e professor auxiliar na Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

References

AURÉLIO, D. P. Espinosa, Kelsen e a natureza da norma jurídica. Discurso. Revista do Departamento de Filosofia da USP, v. 45, n. 2, p.147-185, 2015. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2015.112513. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2015.112513. Acesso em 31 jan. 2024.

BAUME, S. On political theology: A controversy between Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. History of European Ideas, v. 35, n. 3, p. 369-381, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2009.01.001. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2009.01.001. Acesso em 24 jan. 2024.

BERGER, M. G. A Kantian Interpretation of Kelsen’s Basic Norm. Ratio Juris, v. 33, n. 1, p. 35-48, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/raju.12266. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12266. Acesso em 24 jan. 2024.

BRUNKHORST, H. Critique of Dualism: Hans Kelsen and the Twentieth Century Revolution in International Law. Constellations v. 18, n. 4, p. 496-512, 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.2011.00655.x. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2011.00655.x. Acesso em 24 jan. 2024.

BOBBIO, N. Diritto e potere: Saggi su Kelsen. Turim: G. Giappichelli Editore, 2013.

DYZENHAUS, D. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 1997.

GUASTINI, R. Introduzione. In: KELSEN, H. La teoria politica del bolscevismo e altri saggi, Milão: Il Saggiatore, 1981. p. 7-36.

INVERNIZZI ACCETTI, C. The Temporality of Normativity: Hans Kelsen’s Overcoming of the Problem of the Foundation for Legal Validity. Philosophy & Social Criticism, v. 42, n. 1, p. 25-43, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0191453715580054. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715580054. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2024.

KAUFMANN E.; NAWIASKY, H.; HENSEL, A.; BÜHLER, O. Die Gleichheit vor dem Gesetz im Sinne des Art. 109 der Reichsverfassung. Der Einfluß des Steuerrechts auf die Begriffsbildung des öffentlichen Rechts. Berichte von Erich Kaufmann, Hans Nawiasky, Albert Hensel und Ottmar Bühler. Verhandlungen der Tagung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer zu Münster i.W. am 29. und 30. März 1926. Mit einem Auszug aus der Aussprache. Berlim: Walter de Gruyter, 1927. DOI: 10.1515/9783112599945. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112599945. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2023.

KELSEN, H. Diskussionsrede. In: Die Gleichheit vor dem Gesetz im Sinne des Art. 109 der Reichsverfassung. Der Einfluß des Steuerrechts auf die Begriffsbildung des öffentlichen Rechts. Berichte von Erich Kaufmann, Hans Nawiasky, Albert Hensel und Ottmar Bühler. Verhandlungen der Tagung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer zu Münster i.W. am 29. und 30. März 1926. Mit einem Auszug aus der Aussprache. Berlim: Walter de Gruyter, 1927. p. 53-55. DOI: 10.1515/9783112599945. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112599945. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2024.

KELSEN, H. Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre. Tubinga: Mohr Siebeck, 1928.

KELSEN, H. Der Wandel des Souveränitätsbegriffes. In: Studi filosofico-giuridici dedicati a Giorgio del Vecchio. Modena: Società Tipografica Modenese, 1931. t. II, p. 8-9.

KELSEN, H. International Peace - by Court or by Government? American Journal of Sociology, v. 46, n. 4, p. 571-581, 1941. DOI: 10.1086/218699. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1086/218699. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2023.

KELSEN, H. The Law as a Specific Social Technique. The University of Chicago Law Review, v. 9, n. 1, p. 75-97, 1941. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1597151. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2024.

KELSEN, H. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1945.

KELSEN, H. Foundations of Democracy. Ethics, v. 66, n. 1, p. 1-101, 1955. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2378551. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2023.

KELSEN, H. God and the State. In: WEINBERGER, O. (ed.). Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy. Dordrecht, Países Baixos: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1973, p. 61-82.

KELSEN, H. The Pure Theory of Law, ‘Labandism’, and Neo-Kantianism. A Letter to Renato Treves. In: PAULSON, S. L. (ed.). Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. p.168-175.

KELSEN, H. Selbstdarstellung (1927). In: JESTAEDT, M. (org.). Hans Kelsen Werke. Veröffentlichte Schriften 1905-1910 und Selbstzeugnisse, v. 1. Tubinga: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.

KELSEN, H. Teoria Pura do Direito (2.ª edição). Lisboa: Edições Almedina, 2019.

LA TORRE, M. Law as Institution. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.

LOSANO, M. G. Sistema e Estrutura no Direito. O século XX, vol. 2. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

PAULSON, S. Arriving at a Defensible Periodization of Hans Kelsen’s Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, v. 19, n. 2, p. 351-364, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20468276. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2024.

PAULSON, S. Some Issues in the Exchange between Hans Kelsen and Erich Kaufmann. Scandinavian studies in law, n. 48, p. 269-290, 2005. Disponível em: https://lawpub.se/en/artikel/5572. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2023.

PAULSON, S. Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt: Growing Discord, Culminating in the ‘Guardian’ Controversy of 1932. In: MEIERHENRICH, J.; SIMONS, O. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. p. 510-546.

SCHEUERMAN, W. E. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberal Constitutionalism. The Review of Politics, v. 58, n. 2, p. 299-322, 1996. DOI: 10.1017/S0034670500019392. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500019392. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2024.

SCHMILL, U. La influencia de Hermann Cohen en Hans Kelsen. Isonomía: Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho, n. 21, p. 117-155, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/la-influencia-de-hermann-cohen-en-hans-kelsen-0/

SCHMITT, C. Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

SCHMITT, C. Constitutional Theory. Durham e Londres: Duke University Press, 2008.

STOLLEIS, M. A History of Public Law in Germany (1914-1945). Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2008.

VINX, L. Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2007.

VINX, L. The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

VINX, L. Hans Kelsen and the material constitution of democracy. Jurisprudence, v. 12, n. 4, p. 466-490, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2021.1921493. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.1921493. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2024.

ZOLO, D. Recensione a H. Kelsen, Socialismo e Stato. Quaderni Fiorentini, n. 8, p. 382-388, 1979.

Published

2024-11-27

How to Cite

PINHEIRO, I.; DAMELE, G. DIREITO E PODER EM KELSEN. UNESP Journal of Legal Studies, Franca, v. 28, n. 47, p. 55–76, 2024. Disponível em: https://ojs.franca.unesp.br/index.php/estudosjuridicosunesp/article/view/4418. Acesso em: 14 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Cidadania Civil e Política e Sistemas Normativos